Published 2020-12-20
Keywords
- Proceso,
- evaluación docente,
- repercusiones
- Process,
- teacher assessment,
- repercussions
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This research is carried out under a qualitative method, with a phenomenological design, using interview as technique, through recordings of anecdotes and experiences of teachers who have been assessed. The main research question is: What are the repercussions of a standardized assessment in the personal area, based on the experience of the teachers who have been assessed? Among the results found stands out that teachers consider that the assessment was an instrument that sought to purge the teaching staff and provide opportunities for other teaching related professions to enter the teaching practice; the label assigned to them based on the score obtained was punitive, in the sense that it did not respect the working conditions of those who were called upon to be part of the process. They also consider that only the theoretical part was taken into account, the practical one was not considered, at least not realistically, because of the ease of retouching the products that were requested at their own convenience, by prioritizing and showing only the successful part of the reality. On the other hand, although what was asked of them was something inherent to their practice, having to face the anxiety of losing their job, social or economic status shifted their comfort zone and stability, so their personal environment was significantly damaged, physically, mentally, and emotionally.
References
- Bolio, A. (2012). Husserl y la fenomenología trascendental: Perspectivas del sujeto en las ciencias del siglo XX. Reencuentro, (65), 20-29. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/340/34024824004.pdf.
- Creswell, J. (2003). Diseño de investigación. Enfoques cualitativo, cuantitativo y con métodos mixtos (2a. ed.). Lincoln: Universidad de Nebraska.
- Cruz, Y., Hincapié, D., y Rodríguez, C. (2020). Apéndice de profesores a prueba: claves para una evaluación docente exitosa. Nota Técnica No. IDB-TN-1782. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
- Díaz, F. (2019). La evaluación obligatoria y su sentido para el profesorado de telesecundarias: entre el temor, control y sometimiento. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 9(18).
- Fernández, M., Alcaraz, N., y Sola, M. (2017). Evaluación y pruebas estandarizadas: una reflexión sobre el sentido, utilidad y efectos de estas pruebas en el campo educativo. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 10(1), 51-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2017.10.1.003.
- Hernández, F., Beltrán, J., y Marrero, A. (2011). Teorías sobre la sociedad, familia y educación (2a. ed.). España: Universidad de Valencia.
- Hernández, R., Fernández, C., y Baptista, M. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a. ed.). México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
- Ramos, L. (2020). El docente como profesional de la educación. Artículo Editorial. Archivos en Medicina Familiar, 22(1), 1-6.
- Saavedra, L., y Saavedra, S. (2014). El sentido pedagógico de la evaluación del profesorado. Sophia, (10).
- SEP [Secretaría de Educación Pública] (2019). La Nueva Escuela Mexicana: principios y orientaciones. México: Subsecretaría de Educación Media Superior. Recuperado de: https://dfa.edomex.gob.mx/sites/dfa.edomex.gob.mx/files/files/NEM%20principios%20y%20orientacio%C3%ADn%20pedago%C3%ADgica.pdf.