Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Enero-diciembre
D) Currículum, conocimientos y prácticas educativas

Predictive validity of the Instrument for the high school’s admissions diagnostic assessment

Oscar Luis Ochoa Martínez
Universidad Pedagógica de Durango, México
Edgar Ochoa Martínez
Colegio de Estudios Científicos y Tecnológicos del Estado de Durango, México
Gloria Rocío Nery León
Escuela Secundaria General México, Durango, México

Published 2017-01-02

Keywords

  • Validez,
  • predicción,
  • instrumento,
  • bachillerato
  • Validity,
  • prediction,
  • instrument,
  • high school

How to Cite

Ochoa Martínez, O. L., Ochoa Martínez, E., & Nery León, G. R. (2017). Predictive validity of the Instrument for the high school’s admissions diagnostic assessment. RECIE. Revista Electrónica Científica De Investigación Educativa, 3(2), 1105-1115. https://doi.org/10.33010/recie.v3i2.2051

Abstract

At a national level and in particular the Colegio de Estudios Científicos y Tecnológicos del Estado de Durango (CECyTED), invests significant resources in the application of the Diagnostic Assessment Instrument for Admission to high school in the test and retest modality of Mathematical Skill (MS) and reading ability (RA), A study was done with the aim of measuring its predictive validity, since there is no evidence that the test has been subject to measurement of its psychometric properties.

To validate the instrument, the score obtained by a selected sample of 34 aspirants of new entrance to this academic level was used, having as a predictive variable the score of their average grades obtained in the secondary school (PPROSEC) and as criterion variables; the average score of their grade obtained in the first semester of high school (PPROMB); the first to determine the predictive validity of the Instrument retrospectively and the second one prospectively. The process of analysis of the information included normality, correlation and simple linear regression tests that were performed with the use of the SPSS program. The end result obtained verified the criterion validity of the MS Instrument because its test and retest scores are retrospective predictors of the PPROMS score; while the criterion validity of the RA Instrument was merely confirmed for the retest.

References

  1. Barraza, A. (2010). Validación del inventario de expectativas de autoeficacia académica en tres muestras secuenciales. CPUe, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 1-30.
  2. Pallares, M. (1981). Técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación. (2a. ed.). Barcelona, España: Ediciones CEAC, S. A.
  3. Consejo del Sistema Nacional de Educación tecnológica. (2004). Modelo de la Educación Media Superior Tecnológica. Distrito Federal, México: COSNET.
  4. Rodríguez, D., y Valldeoriola, J. (2009). Metodología de la investigación. Barcelona, España: UOC.
  5. Babbie, E. (2000). Fundamentos de la investigación social. Distrito Federal, México: Thompson Editores.
  6. Jiménez, A. (2006). Xataka Ciencia. Recuperado el 8 de 11 de 2015, de www.xatakaciencia.com/matematicas/contraste-de-shapiro-wilg
  7. Martínez, R. (1996). Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. Madrid, España: Editorial Síntesis, S. A.
  8. Moreira, T. (2006). Estimación de la validez predictiva de las pruebas de bachillerato en educación media. Actualidades en Psicología, 121-140.
  9. Pallares, M. (1981). Técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación (2a ed.). Barcelona, España: Ediciones CEAC, S. A.
  10. Anastasi, A. (1978). Tests psicológicos (3a ed.). Madrid, España: Aguilar.