Vol. 7 (2023): Publicación continua
E) Procesos de formación y actores de la educación

La adquisición de complementos infinitivos y gerundios en inglés como segunda lengua por estudiantes mexicanos universitarios

PDF (English)
  • Selene Maya Ruiz
Selene Maya Ruiz
Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, México
Biografía
Portada-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33010/recie.v7i0.1867

Publicado 2023-10-17

Palabras clave

  • conciencia metalingüística,
  • gerundio,
  • infinitivo
  • Awareness,
  • gerund,
  • infinitive,
  • metalinguistic

Cómo citar

Maya Ruiz, S. (2023). La adquisición de complementos infinitivos y gerundios en inglés como segunda lengua por estudiantes mexicanos universitarios. RECIE. Revista Electrónica Científica De Investigación Educativa, 7, e1867. https://doi.org/10.33010/recie.v7i0.1867

Derechos de autor 2023

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Resumen

La conciencia metalingüística se ha evaluado principalmente a través de pruebas de conocimiento metalingüístico y de juicios de gramaticalidad. Entonces, existe una cantidad limitada de investigaciones cualitativas sobre cómo puede desarrollarse la conciencia metalingüística entre adolescentes o adultos jóvenes en tareas verbales de reflexión grupal. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo explorar el desempeño de estudiantes universitarios cuando estos reflexionan sobre los complementos de gerundio e infinitivo en inglés como L2 al completar tareas gramaticales para desarrollar su conciencia metalingüística. El estudio vincula un marco sociocultural con entrevistas semiestructuradas de recuerdo estimulado para el desarrollo de la conciencia metalingüística, ya que ambos ayudan a los participantes a reflexionar sobre los patrones de uso y generalizaciones en estructuras lingüísticas subyacentes a través de la interacción verbal. Los datos analizados consisten en las puntuaciones de cada tarea y el análisis del discurso de los participantes. Los resultados revelan que hacer que los estudiantes identifiquen las reglas subyacentes de los complementos de gerundio e infinitivo contribuirá indirectamente a su adquisición. Las conclusiones apuntaron a que los estudiantes prestaran atención a las características específicas de la lengua para ser plenamente conscientes de la forma de los patrones lingüísticos.

PDF (English)

Citas

  1. Ableeva, R., & Lantolf, J. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 133-149.
  2. Absi, Z. (2014). Metalinguistic knowledge and speaking proficiency in Syrian university-level learners of English [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Essex.
  3. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.
  4. Altman, C., Goldstein, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2018). Vocabulary, metalinguistic awareness and language dominance among bilingual preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01953
  5. Andrews, S. (1999). Why do L2 teachers need to ‘know about language’? Teacher metalinguistic awareness and input for learning. Language and Education, 13(3), 161-177 http://hdl.handle.net/10722/42666
  6. Bialystok, E., Peets, K., & Moreno, S. (2014). Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000288
  7. Çandarl, D. (2020). Changes in L2 writers’ self-reported metalinguistic knowledge of lexical phrases over one academic year. The Language Learning Journal, 48(6), 768-784.
  8. Conti, G. (2011). Defining a rule for the use of infinitive and gerund complements. English Language Teaching, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p3
  9. Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
  10. Dickens, P., & Woods, E. (1988). Some criteria for the development of communicative grammar tasks. Tesol Quarterly, 22(4), 623-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587260
  11. Duffley, P. (2000). Gerund versus infinitive as complement of transitive verbs in English: The problems of “tense” and “control.” Journal of English Linguistics, 28(3), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754240022005018
  12. Duncan, L., Casalis, S., & Cole, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(3), 405-440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409090213
  13. Egi, T., Adams, R., & Nuevo, A. (2013). Is metalinguistic stimulated recall reactive in second language learning? In J. Bergsleithner, S. Nagem & J. Yoshioka (eds), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in Honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 81-102). National Foreign Language Resource Center
  14. Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching – Practice or consciousness-raising. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167-174). Cambridge University Press.
  15. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. Tesol Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512
  16. Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. Tesol Quarterly, 28(2), 323-351.
  17. Francis, N. (2006). The development of secondary discourse ability and metalinguistic awareness in second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 37-60.
  18. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Routledge.
  19. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. Taylor & Francis.
  20. Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 423-449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000041
  21. Ha, X. (2022). Oral corrective feedback in Vietnamese EFL classrooms: Effects of awareness-raising activities on teachers’ beliefs and practices [Doctoral dissertation]. Macquarie University.
  22. Huddleston, R. (2002). Non-finite and verbless clauses. In R. Huddleston & G. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (pp. 1171-1272). Cambridge University Press.
  23. Ko, H. (2022). Explicit knowledge of English grammar and sentence writing with implicit knowledge by Korean students. English Teaching, 77(1), 3-20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1342999.pdf
  24. König, E., Stark, D., & Requardt, S. (1990). Adverbien und Partikeln. Groos.
  25. Lantolf, J. (2001). Sociocultural theory and SLA. In R. Kaplan (ed.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 109-119). Oxford University Press.
  26. Lantolf, J. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox Publishing.
  27. Lantolf, J., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108-124.
  28. Mohamed, N. (2004). Consciousness-raising tasks: A learner perspective. ELT Journal, 58(3), 228-237.
  29. Moore, E. (2012). Book review: The role of metalinguistic awareness in the effective teaching of foreign languages (Rethinking Education, vol. 10), by Anthony David Roberts (2011). Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 5(3), 66-71.
  30. Njika, J. (2015). Teacher metalinguistic awareness as an essential component of language teaching/learning: Case study of ELT in Cameroon. Syllabus Review, Human & Social Sci., 6(2), 23-52.
  31. Payant, C., & Maatouk, Z. (2022). Collaborative writing in a third language: How writers use and view their plurilingual repertoire during collaborative writing tasks. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 25(1), 127-151.
  32. Petrovitz, W. (2001). The sequencing of verbal-complement structures. ELT Journal, 55(2), 172-177.
  33. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Basic Books.
  34. Ramirez, G., Walton, P., & Roberts, W. (2013). Morphological awareness and vocabulary development among kindergarteners with different ability levels. Journal of Learning Disabiliies, 47(1), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509970
  35. Rezaei, A., & Hosseinpur, R. (2011). On the role of consciousness-raising tasks in learning grammer: A learner perspective. Irainian EFL Journal, 239-240.
  36. Rimmer, W. (2006). Measuring grammatical complexity: The Gordian knot. Language Testing, 23(4), 497-519.
  37. Roehr, K. (2006). Metalinguistic knowledge in L2 task performance: A verbal protocol analysis. Language Awareness, 15(3), 180-198.
  38. Roza, V. (2014). A model of grammar teaching through consciousness-raising activities. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(3), 1-5.
  39. Salazar, J., Quesada, E., Rojas, M., Barrantes, D., Madrigal, L., & Vargas, J. (2018). Consciousness raising tasks for the learning of grammar in high school English language classrooms. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 18(3), 88-115. https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i3.34330
  40. Schoonmaker, A. (2015). Increasing metalinguistics awareness as a necessary precursor for preservice teachers. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 1470.
  41. Schoonmaker, A., & Purmensky, K. (2019). The case for grammar: What preservice teachers need to know about metalinguistic awareness. Journal of English Learner Education, 9(1). https://stars.library.ucf.edu/jele/vol9/iss1/1
  42. Shabani, K. (2016). Applications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach for teachers’ professional development. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1252177.
  43. Tunmer, W., & Herriman, M. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness: A conceptual overview. In W. Tunmer, C. Pratt & M. Herriman (eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research and implications (pp. 12-35). Springer-Verlag.
  44. Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, trans.). In R. Rieber & A. Carton (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285). Plenum Press.
  45. Vygotsky, L. (1981). The development of higher forms of attention in childhood. In J. Wertsch (ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 189-240). Sharpe.
  46. Vygotsky, L. (1995). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, eds. and trans.). Harvard University Press.
  47. Vygotsky, L. (1998). Infancy. In R. Reiber (ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 5, pp. 207-241). Plenum Press.
  48. Weissberg, B. (2000). Developmental relationships in the acquisition of English syntax: Writing vs. speech. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 37-53.
  49. Widodo, H. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 122-141.
  50. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (1996). Consciousness-raising activities. In Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 63-76). Macmillan Education
  51. Woll, N. (2018). Investigating dimensions of metalinguistic awareness: What think-aloud protocols revealed about the cognitive processes involved in positive transfer from L2 to L3. Language Awareness, 27(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1432057