Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Enero-diciembre
E) Procesos de formación y actores de la educación

Promoting learning applying didactic strategies in the subject of Bases of Research

Cecilia Ibarra Reyes
Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. Jiménez, Chihuahua, México
Teresa Adriana Valdez Burciaga
Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. Jiménez, Chihuahua, México
Luis Alberto Luján Tiscareño
Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. Jiménez, Chihuahua, México

Published 2017-01-02

Keywords

  • Significative learning,
  • didactic strategies,
  • multiple intelligencies
  • Aprendizaje significativo,
  • estrategias didácticas,
  • inteligencias múltiples

How to Cite

Ibarra Reyes, C., Valdez Burciaga, T. A., & Luján Tiscareño, L. A. (2017). Promoting learning applying didactic strategies in the subject of Bases of Research. RECIE. Revista Electrónica Científica De Investigación Educativa, 3(2), 1309-1316. https://doi.org/10.33010/recie.v3i2.2078

Abstract

In this new model for the XXI Century, it is taken into account that students learn in different ways and teaching strategies performed by the professor in the classroom should be focused on achieving significant learning, being necessary to develop and adapt to the new educational model by competencies with the need to apply a variety of didactic Strategies for different learning styles, making a proposal from the perspective of the IM. In order to forge and qualify interest in research, practical actions are needed, therefore, in this research, Gardner's model is used to make a diagnosis of MI in students and pair said intelligence with the encouragement of research, applying different teaching strategies to develop learning. This work was carried out with students in the first semester of the Engineering Degree in Business Management, in the subject of Fundamentals of Research in the Tecnológico de Cd. Jiménez Chih.  August-December 2014 Period. With a total of 34 students, of which 16 are men and 18 women. An index of multiple intelligences for adults was applied in order to assess which intelligences predominate and which ones have to be strengthened through the planning of different strategies, the results were: The Interpersonal with 28.9%; The intrapersonal with 27.35%; The corporal-kinesthetic with a 24.59%; Musical with a 24.12; Naturalist with 23.56%; Logical-Mathematical with a 21.03; Verbal-Linguistics with a 20.91.

References

  1. Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
  2. Ausubel. D. P y otros (1983). Psicología de la Educación. Un punto de vista cognitivo. México: Trillas.
  3. Bolaños, V. H. (1995). Didáctica integral y para la educación Media Superior. México: Porrúa.
  4. Carrasco, J. B. (2004). Una didáctica para hoy, como enseñar mejor. Madrid: RIALP.
  5. Coll, C., y Colomina, R. (1990). Desarrollo Psicológico y Educación II. En C. Coll, J. Palacios y A. Marchesl (eds.), Psicología de la Educación. Madrid: Alianza.
  6. Gagne, R. M. (1963). The learning requirements for enquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 144-153.
  7. Gardner, H., y Kraus, C. (1981-1987). Good and porcomprender differences in Knowing and regulating reading behaviors. Educational Reseach Quaterly, 6.
  8. Kasuga, L. (1998). Aprendizaje acelerado. México: Grupo Editorial.
  9. Logan, L. M., y Logan, V. G. (1980). Estrategias para una Enseñanza Creativa. Barcelona, España: Oikos-Tau.
  10. Navarro Hinojosa, R. (2007). Didáctica y currículum para el desarrollo de competencias. España: Dikinson.
  11. Raun, Ch. E., y Butts, D. P. (1967). The Strategies of Inquiry in Science and Student Cognitive and Affective Behavior Change. Journal of Reseach in Science Teaching, 5, 261-68.