Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Enero-diciembre
E) Procesos de formación y actores de la educación

The teaching of written culture: conceptions from the teaching practice. An experience of the Diploma Creative readers and written culture of the Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Unidad Unit 097 Sur-CDMX

Ana Magdalena Solís Calvo
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Unidad 097 Sur, Ciudad de México
Juan Manuel Sánchez
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Unidad 097 Sur, Ciudad de México
Julio César Lira González
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Unidad 097 Sur, Ciudad de México

Published 2017-01-02

Keywords

  • Written culture,
  • teacher training,
  • social practices
  • Cultura escrita,
  • formación docente,
  • prácticas sociales

How to Cite

Solís Calvo, A. M., Sánchez, J. M., & Lira González, J. C. (2017). The teaching of written culture: conceptions from the teaching practice. An experience of the Diploma Creative readers and written culture of the Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Unidad Unit 097 Sur-CDMX. RECIE. Revista Electrónica Científica De Investigación Educativa, 3(2), 1201-1209. https://doi.org/10.33010/recie.v3i2.2063

Abstract

The current plans and programs of basic education in our country regarding the teaching of Spanish, arise from the focus of social practices and privilege the written culture as a means for the concretion of knowledge for life according to the first of these competencies. This document will analyze the conceptions that teachers of basic education have regarding the premises and the practices carried out in their classrooms, through the Diploma Creative readers and written culture that 36 teachers attended in Unit 097. The level of analysis reported in this document makes it possible to characterize the existence of institutional conceptions that refer to programs established by the Ministry of Public Education that adhere to views of what it means to read and write at school. Said views differ from what is established in the same plans and basic education programs. We have classified other conceptions of formation, in them, we find assumptions of teachers about what is important for their students to learn about and how they learned to read and write where the cognitive approach and the orthographic and grammatical rules are essential. Finally, the conceptions that we have called expositions allow us to recognize that from the closeness and experience that the teachers have with didactics. focused on social practices and written culture they resignify the communicative practical concept and experiment with texts, their students and communication.

References

  1. Cazden, C. (1988). The Structure of Lessons. In Classroom Discourse the Language of Teaching and Learning. Heinemann Portsmouth NH, United States of America.
  2. Dyson, A. (2005). On the case Approches to language and literacy research, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York and London.
  3. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning, a Critique of Traditional Schooling. Routledge, New York.
  4. Gumperz, J. (1999). Sociocultural Knowledge in Conversational Inference. In A. Joworski & N. Coupland (Eds.) The Discourse Reader. Routledge, London.
  5. Heath S. & Street, B. (1983). On Etnograph. Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. Teachers College Press, New York.
  6. Hernández, G. (2004). Pobres pero leídos. Fondo de Cultura. México.
  7. Hymes, D. (1964). Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in linguistics and Anthropology. Harper & Row, United States of America.
  8. Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social live. En J. J. Gumperz y D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehat, & Winston.
  9. Kalman, J. (2001). Las prácticas de Lectura y Escritura frente a las nuevas tecnologías de comunicación e Informática. En Matute, E. y Romo M. Los Retos de la Educación del Siglo XXI. Universidad de Guadalajara, México.
  10. Kalman, J. (2003). Escribir en la plaza. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.
  11. Kalman, J. (2004). Saber lo que es la letra: vías de acceso a la cultura escrita para un grupo de mujeres en Mixquic. Instituto de la Educación de la UNESCO. Secretaría de Educación Pública. México.
  12. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routlege, London.
  13. Quiroz, R. (2006). Reforma de la educación secundaria en México: currículum y prácticas de enseñanza. Disponible en: https://problemasypoliticasdeeducacionbasica.wikispaces.com/file/view/BIV-5_Reforma_Educacion_Secundaria_en_Mexico.pdf (29 de mayo de 2016).
  14. Secretaría de Educación Pública (2006). Plan de estudios 2006. Educación básica, Secundaria. México, SEP.
  15. Secretaría de Educación Pública (2007) Programa Sectorial de Educación 2007-2012. SEP, México.
  16. Secretaría de Educación Pública (2010). Estándares Nacionales de Habilidad Lectora. Disponible en: https://www.sep.gob.mx/work/appsite/lectura.pdf (29 de mayo
  17. de 2016).
  18. Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2013). Programa Nacional de lectura y escritura. Disponible en: http://www.lectura.dgmie.sep.gob.mx/estrategia/
  19. Street, B. (Ed.) (1993). Cross cultural approaches to Literacy. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Zarzosa, Escobedo, Martínez y Aguilar (2011). La comprensión lectora en México y su relación con la investigación empírica externa. Revista Mexicana de Psicología Educativa, 2(1), 15-30.